Category:Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes
 | This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories.
This is a hidden category. It is not shown on its member pages, unless the corresponding user preference (Appearance → Show hidden categories) is set. |
 | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
"POV" is an abbreviation for "Point of View". It is most commonly used to signify that, in the opinion of the editor, some statement is biased, which is to say that it is "non-neutral and takes a point of view". Non-neutral content or style conflicts with Wikipedia's goal of being a neutral source of factual — and independently verifiable — information.
POV contrasts with "NPOV", an abbreviation for "Neutral Point of View", Wikipedia's editorial approach. See the page WP:NPOV for this policy.
{{Catholic cleanup}}, {{Coatrack}}, {{Obit}}, {{POV}}, {{POV lead}}, {{Political POV}}, {{USgovtPOV}}, {{POV map}}, and {{POV section}} all put articles in this category.
This page has a backlog of over 5,500 articles as of January 2018. You can help clean this up! See the Wikipedia:POV Cleanup page.
You can also help by sub-categorizing disputes.
Articles which may or may not have neutrality problems, being based on a partisan source, are also included here.
See also
[edit]This category is a self-reference.
Subcategories
This category has the following 159 subcategories, out of 159 total.
A
Pages in category "Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes"
The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.